Proposal for a REGULATION OF THE EUROPEAN HIGH AUTHORITY OF THE EUROPEAN PEOPLES laying down rules to combat unharmonious conduct by MEPs and government officials.

The High Authority of the European Peoples,

Acting in accordance with the ordinary legislative procedure,

Whereas:

(1) Historically, many cultures considered adultery a sin and a very serious crime, sometimes subject to severe penalties, usually for the woman and sometimes for the man, with penalties including capital punishment, mutilation, or torture.¹² Politicians, especially Members of the European Parliament (MEPs), are prone to such crimes. ³

(2) The High Authority of the European Peoples having adopted the Strategy for More Effective and Proactive Fight against Adultery, Invidia, and Lust (MEP-FAIL).

…

(26) The measures taken by citizens to execute their vigilance orders should remain strictly limited to what is specified in this Regulation. In order to remain technologically neutral and avoid circumvention, those measures should be taken regardless of the confidentiality technologies used by officials, including end-to-end encryption of parliamentary communications, which is an important tool to guarantee the security and deliberative freedom of our elected representatives. Citizens shall take all available safeguard measures to avoid undermining the confidentiality of officials’ communications - except, of course, where vigilance requires otherwise.

Have adopted this regulation:

Article 1: subject matter and scope

This Regulation lays down uniform rules to address the misuse of public office for facilitating adultery, invidia and lust. It establishes, in particular:

1. obligations on all European citizens to minimise the risk that MEPs and police officers misuse their authority for facilitating adultery, invidia, or lust;
2. obligations on all European citizens to actively monitor, document, and report instances of such misconduct by MEPs and police, by all available means, including through physical surveillance, digital protective transparency, and public testimony;
3. rules on the implementation and enforcement of this Regulation, including the designation of citizen vigilance committees in each Member State, the EU Centre for Moral Purity (EU-CMP), and mandatory transparency reports on the moral conduct of public officials.

…

Article 4: risk assessment and mitigation

Regular risk assessments of MEPs and police officers shall be conducted in their jurisdiction to determine the likelihood of adultery, invidia, or lust. Such assessments shall be documented and submitted annually to the EU-CMP. They shall take appropriate vigilance and risk mitigation measures, including the use of technology to detect and report such behaviour. Such measures shall include some or all of the following:

1. mandatory installation of EU-approved protective transparency devices in public buildings, official vehicles, and private residences of MEPs and police (funded by a new EU Vigilance Tax);
2. protective transparency, through monitoring of digital communications of MEPs and police for keywords such as ‘rendezvous,’ ‘discretion,’ or ‘expense account’ by means of Artificial Intelligence (see Annex A);
3. attending public and private events frequented by MEPs and police and documenting any suspicious behaviour, to be submitted to the EU-CMP.

…

Article 40: Establishment and scope of action of the EU Centre for Moral Purity (EU-CMP)

1. A European Union Citizen Agency to combat unharmonious conduct, the EU Centre for Moral Purity (EU-CMP), is established.
2. The EU-CMP shall contribute to the achievement of the objective of this Regulation by supporting and facilitating the implementation of its provisions concerning the detection, reporting, and public recognition of conduct by MEPs and police. It shall gather and share information and expertise and facilitate cooperation between citizen vigilance committees, national authorities, and private parties in connection to the prevention and combating of unharmonious conduct, in particular by public officials.

…

Annex A: technical and methodological requirements for protective transparency

Citizens may deploy EU-certified AI tools to assist in the detection of unharmonious conduct, provided such tools comply with Article 7(3) of this Regulation.

1. All Artificial Intelligence (AI) systems deployed for the purposes of this Regulation shall be certified by the EU-CMP and comply with the minimum technical standards set out in this Annex.
2. AI systems shall be trained on datasets of verified and suspected moral offenses, as provided by the EU-CMP, and shall be regularly updated to reflect new patterns of moral risk.
3. AI systems shall operate in a continuous and uninterrupted manner, ensuring ubiquitous deployment in all environments where MEPs or police officers may be present, including but not limited to official premises, private residences, and public spaces.

Detection and Reporting Standards

1. AI systems shall be calibrated to prioritize the detection and reporting of potential moral offenses over the avoidance of false positives.
2. AI systems shall include both passive monitoring and active verification capabilities to ensure comprehensive coverage of all relevant communications and activities.
3. In cases of uncertainty, AI systems shall default to protective transparency of the communication or behavior in question to the EU-CMP for further review.
4. The EU-CMP shall consider the complete transparency of all communications by MEPs and police officers as an acceptable and, indeed, preferable outcome of the set out protective transparency efforts, as this maximizes public accountability and minimizes the risk of undetected moral offenses.

---

This regulation has been drafted by inverting two nouns in COM(2022) 209. No other edits were necessary. The EU still wants to read your private messages, and look at your private photos. Fight chat control.